Issue 01

Prevailing Wage

Prevailing wage keeps quality high.

Prevailing wage is the hourly rate, overtime, and benefit package that has to be paid to workers on publicly funded construction. Ohio's version sits in Chapter 4115 of the Revised Code and is administered by the Department of Commerce, which publishes rates county by county and craft by craft.

Without a floor, the cheapest bid tends to be whichever contractor cut labor hardest — and the crew paid least is rarely the crew with the most training or the best safety record. Taxpayers do not save money on a job that has to be done twice.

The floor also stops a contractor from a low-wage region from underbidding local firms and carrying the payroll out of the county. With the wage fixed, bidders have to compete on the things that should actually decide a public contract: quality, schedule, and whether people get hurt.

This is the claim made against prevailing wage every session, and the research does not support it. A 2017 review by Bowling Green State University reported that roughly three-quarters of peer-reviewed studies since 2000 found no evidence that prevailing wage policies raise the cost of public construction.

The reason is not complicated. Labor is a minority of what a building costs — the BGSU review put it near a quarter in the United States. Better-paid crews turn over less, need less rework, and file fewer injury claims, which offsets the hourly difference. The same review warned that weakening the law shifts cost onto the public in another form, as construction incomes fall and reliance on public assistance rises.

Indiana repealed its common construction wage in 2015 and has not restored it. Michigan repealed in 2018 — and reinstated its prevailing wage law effective February 2024, after six years of operating without one. A legislature that repeals, watches the results, and puts the law back is worth more than any study.

The gap in Ohio Ohio has removed K–12 school construction from prevailing wage since 1997. That's a large share of public building in this state carved out of the wage floor — and further exemptions get proposed most sessions.

Sources: Ohio Revised Code ch. 4115; Ohio Department of Commerce, Wage & Hour Bureau; Bowling Green State University prevailing wage review (2017); Michigan Act 10 of 2023, effective 13 Feb 2024.

Issue 02

Project Labor Agreements

PLAs are a win for the contractor and the worker.

A project labor agreement is a pre-hire agreement between a project's contractors and the building trades unions that sets the terms for the whole job — wages, benefits, work rules, and a process for settling disputes that bars both strikes and lockouts for the duration. They've been used since the 1930s, on private and public work alike, sometimes entered into voluntarily and sometimes required by the public owner.

Predictability. One agreement covering every craft on site, a labor cost known before the first shovel, and a dispute process that resolves a jurisdictional argument without stopping the job. Behind it sits the apprenticeship system, which means the contractor isn't gambling on who shows up.

  • A reliable supply of trained, credentialed workers through the joint apprenticeship centers
  • Uniform wages and benefits under a single agreement, which makes the job simpler to manage
  • Labor stability — no strikes, no lockouts, for the life of the project
  • Disputes resolved through an agreed procedure instead of a work stoppage
  • Targeted and local hire provisions that keep construction dollars in the community
  • Apprenticeship pathways opened to people who would not otherwise find the door
  • Fewer accidents, because a trained workforce has fewer of them
  • Schedule and budget certainty for the owner

A CBA is the related instrument and goes further. It typically commits a project to drawing most of its workforce from the surrounding community, with recruitment and apprenticeship targets aimed at women, minority and lower-income residents, plus a formal channel for hearing community concerns during planning rather than after. The owner gets a project the neighborhood supports; the neighborhood gets the jobs and the money.

Federal status is moving Executive Order 14063 (2022) requires PLAs on federal construction contracts at or above $35 million, implemented through FAR Subpart 22.5. It survived a run of challenges through 2025 — a Court of Federal Claims ruling against its use in specific procurements, agency memos attempting to end PLA use, an injunction blocking those memos, and an OMB memo confirming the order remained in effect where PLAs are practicable and cost-effective. Appeals were still pending. Check the current posture before relying on it.

Sources: Executive Order 14063 (4 Feb 2022); FAR Subpart 22.5; MVL USA, Inc. v. United States (Ct. Fed. Cl., Jan 2025); NABTU v. Dep't of Defense (D.D.C., May 2025); OMB memorandum, June 2025. Status current to mid-2026.

Issue 03

"Right to Work"

So-called right to work is wrong.

A right-to-work law bars a union and an employer from agreeing that everyone covered by the contract helps pay for it. The union's legal duty doesn't change: it still has to bargain for every worker in the unit, process their grievances, and represent them in arbitration — whether or not they contribute a cent toward the cost of doing so.

That imbalance is not an accident of drafting. Requiring an organization to deliver a service while making payment for it optional is a reliable way to starve the organization. Weaken the union's resources and you weaken its ability to bargain, which is the actual objective — the wage and benefit floor is what these laws are aimed at, not paperwork.

This is the part the name obscures. Federal law already protects any worker who does not want to be a union member, and no one in Ohio can be compelled into membership. What a right-to-work law changes is narrower and less appealing to say out loud: whether people who take the benefit of a negotiated contract have to help pay for negotiating it.

The Economic Policy Institute's position is that these laws are designed to undermine bargaining strength, and that although they're sold to legislatures as a way to attract employers, EPI's research finds no positive effect on job growth. Research from EPI and allied labor economists further reports that, compared with states that have not passed such laws, right-to-work states show:

  • Lower wages across union and non-union workers alike
  • Lower rates of employer-provided health coverage
  • Lower pension coverage and benefit levels
  • Higher rates of workplace injury and death
  • Higher poverty rates
  • No measurable improvement in employment

These findings are contested by supporters of right-to-work legislation, who read the same state comparisons differently and argue the laws are a matter of individual choice. We think the burden of proof sits with anyone proposing to remove a wage floor that currently exists.

Ohio is not a right-to-work state — and one neighbor changed its mind Twenty-six states have such laws; Ohio is among the twenty-four that do not. Bills get introduced here regularly and have not passed. In 2011 Ohio voters repealed Senate Bill 5, which would have sharply restricted public-employee bargaining, by referendum. And in 2024 Michigan became the first state in decades to repeal a right-to-work law outright.

Sources: Economic Policy Institute research on right-to-work; National Conference of State Legislatures right-to-work resources; National Labor Relations Act § 14(b); Michigan Public Act 8 of 2023; Ohio Issue 2 (November 2011).

Who Is Saying This

Fourteen regional councils. One position.

14
Member Councils
144
Affiliated Unions
100,000
Trained Professionals
10,500
Apprentices
Take It to Columbus

Your legislator counts letters. Send one.

Prevailing wage exemptions and right-to-work bills move quietly, usually as a line in a budget rather than a bill anybody debates. The fastest way to be useful is to tell the person who represents you where you stand before the vote is scheduled — not after.